Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1056

reference
781-tree-1
name
1056
tree-preservation-order

undefined

781-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.035463 50.862760)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.035420 50.862756,-1.035422 50.862764,-1.035428 50.862772,-1.035438 50.862778,-1.035449 50.862782,-1.035463 50.862783,-1.035476 50.862782,-1.035488 50.862778,-1.035497 50.862772,-1.035503 50.862765,-1.035506 50.862757,-1.035504 50.862748,-1.035498 50.862741,-1.035489 50.862735,-1.035477 50.862731,-1.035464 50.862729,-1.035438 50.862734,-1.035429 50.862740,-1.035423 50.862748,-1.035420 50.862756)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL